三、 技术标分析technical proposal evaluation
This tender is Piling&excavation&retaining and protecting for foundation contracting tendering. The main point of the Piling&excavation&retaining and protecting for foundation contractor’s job contains two parts: One part is the design and construction working of the Piling&excavation&retaining and protecting for foundation as a construction contractor; the other is the coordinate with the general contractor and other subcontractors. U man thinks that the important point of this project is the negotiation and coordination to all contractors to complete this project in the limit of contract period (160days) as requested with schedule, quality, and safety in controlling.
本次招标为管桩及基坑支护开挖工程招标。作为管桩及基坑支护开挖分包商，其主要工作重点分为两部分：一部分为管桩及基坑支护开挖工程现场施工单位，必须为其负责的工作进度、质量、安全、验收等负责；另一部分为作为管桩及基坑支护开挖分包单位，与本项目的总包及其他分包的协调和配合。裕满认为，本项目的难点在于施工工期紧张，进度、质量、安全在合同规定工期（160天）范围内完成。
The three tenderers had their each advantages and disadvantages in the technical tender document. At the project construction schedule plan part, CBTGC 168 days, Nanjing Ⅷ 110 days,Nantong xinhua only 55days.But According the plan off technical documents,the schedule off Nantong xinhua is 142 days.Uman consider the normal schedule is 160 days.At the construction plan part, CBTGC&Nantong Xinhua can meet the requirement basically with some limitation in general layout plan. At the deepen design drawings part, Nanjing Ⅷ just submit one design plan without the calculation sheet.
上述三家竞标单位提供的技术标各有优劣。在施工进度计划方面，中技工期为168天、南京八建工期为110天、南通新华工期为55天，但根据南通新华提供的进度计划来看其总工期为142天，与其投标函中55天不符，经管理公司测算本工程工期在160日历天左右；在施工方案方面，中技、南通新华的技术方案较全面详细，南京八建的方案不够完整，不够详细，缺少部分内容。
According to the analysis of all technical documents, the reasonable ranking of the five candidates should be: 1. CBTGC; 2. Nantong Xinhua; 3. Nanjing Ⅷ.
三家投标单位的技术标比较合理的顺序依次是中技>南通新华>南京八建。
The submissions and interview results are as following:
各投标单位技术标回标情况如下：
1 中技 CBTGC
Method statement: basically practical;
施工方案：施工方案可行；
Schedule: basically satisfy;
施工进度计划：进度比较合理；
Organization chart: reasonable organization chart;
施工组织框架图：具有合理的组织框架；
Key staff of management: all present;
关键管理人员：项目管理人员基本到位；
Integrated quality control system: the guarantee system is complete
质量：保证体系完整。
Integrated safety control system: the guarantee system is complete
安全：保证体系不完整。
Files management system: no description
文档管理体系： 缺乏叙述。
2南通新华Nantong Xinhua
Method statement: basically practical;
施工方案：施工方案基本可行；
Schedule: Schedule off Tender is Mistake, The time have difference between tender&program;
施工进度计划：投标函工期与进度计划工期不符，明显工期过短；
Organization chart: reasonable organization chart;
施工组织框架图：具有合理的组织框架；
Key staff of management: all present;
关键管理人员：项目管理人员基本到位；
Integrated quality control system: the guarantee system is complete
质量：保证体系完整。
Integrated safety control system: the guarantee system is complete
安全：保证体系不完整。
Files management system: no description
文档管理体系：没有做叙述。
3南京八建 Nanjing Ⅷ
Method statement: basically practical;Without the plan off excavation.
施工方案：方案叙述不完整，针对性不强，缺少土方工程的开挖方案叙述；
Schedule: basically satisfy,.
施工进度计划：进度比较合理；
Organization chart: reasonable organization chart;
施工组织框架图：具有合理的组织框架；
Key staff of management: all present;
关键管理人员：项目管理人员基本到位；
Integrated quality control system: the guarantee system is complete
质量：保证体系完整。
Integrated safety control system: the guarantee system is complete
安全：保证体系不完整。
Files management system: the guarantee system is complete
文档管理体系：没有做叙述。
四、竞标打分 scoring
Combined with the commercial and technical analysis results, the candidates’ tendering documents has been comprehensive scored and evaluated. The results are as follows:
结合商务标和技术标的分析结果，对各投标单位的投标文件进行综合打分测评，其结果分别如下：
The Second evaluation of comprehensive score table
第二轮评标综合打分表
