PD ISO/TS 14071 2014 环境管理-生命周期评估-批判性审查流程和审查者能力 对 ISO 14044 2006 的附加要求和指南(英文版).pdf

14071,critical,ISO,Review,图示,审查,普定,国外及港澳台标准
文档页数:22
文档大小:1.09MB
文档格式:pdf
文档分类:国外及港澳台标准
上传会员:
上传日期:
最后更新:

PD ISO/TS 14071:2014 TECHNICAL ISO/TS SPECIFICATION14071
First edition2014-06-01
Environmentalmanagement-Life cycleassessment-Criticalreview processesandreviewerpetencies: Additionalrequirementsand guidelinestoISO14044:2006 de revue critique et petences des verificateurs: Exigences et lignes Management environnemental -Analyse du cycle de vie - Processus directrices supplementaires α 1ISO 14044:2006
ISO/TS 14071:2014(E) Reference number
ISO 2014
PD ISO/TS 14071:2014 ISO/TS 14071:2014(E)
COPYRIGHTPROTECTEDDOCUMENT ISO 2014 All rights reserved Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 749 09 47 E-mailcopyright@ Published in Switzerland ii@ ISO 2014 All rights reserved
PD ISO/TS 14071:2014 ISO/TS 14071:2014(E)
Contents Page Foreword. iv Introduction. 1Scope.1 2Normative references.1 3Terms and definitions.1 4Critical review process and tasks. 4.1Defining the scope of the critical review. 4.2Selecting, contracting and replacing external reviewer(s). 4.3Critical review process. 4.4Validity of critical review statement and report.5 4.5Critical review report and critical review statement preparation.5 4.6Revision of an existing critical review.7 4.7Critical review tasks.7 5Reviewer(s) petencies.8 Annex A (informative) Template for critical review report.9 Annex B (informative) Example of self-declaration of reviewer independence and petencies10 Bibliography11
@ ISO 2014 All rights reservedi
PD ISO/TS 14071:2014 ISO/TS 14071:2014(E)
Foreword
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical mittees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical mittee has been established has the right to be represented on that mittee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISo, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are different types of ISo documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of on the ISo list of patent declarations received (see Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not constitute an endorsement. For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: Foreword - Supplementary information The mittee responsible for this document is Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, Environmental management, Submittee SC 5, Life cycle assessment.
iv@ ISO 2014 All rights reserved
PD ISO/TS 14071:2014 ISO/TS14071:2014(E)
Introduction For life cycle assessment, critical review is the conformity assessment approach according to ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. These standards contain the overarching requirements for critical review in concise form. Based on these requirements, a mon critical review practice emerged that satisfied stakeholders. For the mandatory case of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies intended to be used in parative assertions intended to be disclosed to the public, the performance of a critical review is established as key feature for the acceptance of the study by stakeholders. However, even in the broad range of applications of LCA, for which a critical review is not mandatory, the missioners of the LCA study to increase credibility. often decide today to perform a voluntary critical review to improve the robustness of their studies and It is one of the key features of critical review that it does not relate to an accreditation scheme, but ensures quality by making the individual reviewer personally responsible for the work and by giving priority to the content rather than the form. Because of the increasing use of LCA itself, as well as the broader application in tools like carbon footprinting or uping labelling initiatives, it is the intention of this Technical Specification to document the established critical review practice in a more prehensive way by providing additional requirements and guidelines for conducting a critical review and the petencies required. This Technical Specification might be applica...

资源链接请先登录(扫码可直接登录、免注册)
①本文档内容版权归属内容提供方。如果您对本资料有版权申诉,请及时联系我方进行处理(联系方式详见页脚)。
②由于网络或浏览器兼容性等问题导致下载失败,请加客服微信处理(详见下载弹窗提示),感谢理解。
③本资料由其他用户上传,本站不保证质量、数量等令人满意,若存在资料虚假不完整,请及时联系客服投诉处理。
④本站仅收取资料上传人设置的下载费中的一部分分成,用以平摊存储及运营成本。本站仅为用户提供资料分享平台,且会员之间资料免费共享(平台无费用分成),不提供其他经营性业务。
投稿会员:匿名用户
我的头像

您必须才能评论!

手机扫码、免注册、直接登录

 注意:QQ登录支持手机端浏览器一键登录及扫码登录
微信仅支持手机扫码一键登录

账号密码登录(仅适用于原老用户)